Guide
IQ and age
Does IQ go down with age? The honest answer has two parts. Different abilities peak at different ages, so what you are best at shifts over a lifetime. But an IQ score compares you with people your own age, so getting older does not, by itself, lower it.
Want your own number? The test is 25 visual puzzles, about 12 minutes, no sign-up.
Different abilities peak at different ages
Abilities do not rise and fall together. Research by Hartshorne and Germine (Hartshorne & Germine, 2015) and by Salthouse (Salthouse, 2009) points to a consistent pattern:
- Processing speed and some reasoning measures peak in the late teens and twenties.
- Vocabulary and accumulated knowledge keep rising into the sixties.
This lines up with the distinction Raymond Cattell drew in 1963 between fluid intelligence, reasoning with new material, and crystallized intelligence, what you have learned (Wikipedia: Fluid and crystallized intelligence). Fluid measures tend to peak early. Crystallized measures keep growing as long as you keep learning. There is no single age at which a person is “smartest”. What changes is the mix.
Why your IQ does not drop just because you age
Modern IQ tests report a deviation IQ. Scores are standardized within each age group, with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 (Wikipedia: Intelligence quotient). A 30-year-old is compared with other 30-year-olds, and a 70-year-old with other 70-year-olds.
So if raw processing speed slows with age, as it typically does, everyone in your age group slows too. Your position among them, which is what the score reports, does not change for that reason alone. A 70-year-old who scores 115 is one standard deviation above the average 70-year-old, exactly as a 30-year-old who scores 115 is above the average 30-year-old.
That has a consequence people often miss: two people with the same IQ but different ages may have answered different numbers of questions correctly. The score is a ranking within an age group, not a raw count.
Try one · Abstract Reasoning
Which tile completes the grid?
Tap the option you think is right, or show the answer.
Show the answer
The missing tile has a large solid square (option 3).
How to solve it
- Start with the first row and name what changes from tile to tile.
- Every row and every column contains each shape (hexagon, square and triangle) exactly once.
- Every row and every column contains each fill (solid, hatched and outline) exactly once.
- The size (large) stays the same in every tile.
- Check the rules on the second row, then apply them to the third.
- So the missing tile has a large solid square.
That was 1 puzzle. The full test has 25.
What does change
Raw performance on speeded and novel reasoning tasks does change across adulthood. At the same time, knowledge and vocabulary build. Many tasks people care about at work and at home draw on both, which is part of why an IQ score is only one input among many.
Genetics matter too, in a way that changes with age. Twin and family studies find that the heritability of intelligence rises from about 20% in infancy to perhaps 80% in later adulthood (Plomin & Deary, 2015). Heritability describes what explains differences across a population; it does not say how much any single person's ability is fixed, and it does not mean environment stops mattering.
Children and IQ
Age norms are especially important for children, whose abilities change quickly from year to year. A child's IQ score only means something when it compares them with children of the same age, on a test built and normed for that age. If you have a question about a child's development or schooling, a licensed psychologist can give an age-appropriate standardized assessment.
How stable is your rank over a lifetime?
Fairly stable, but not fixed. In the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921, scores on the same test taken at age 11 and again at 90 correlated .54, or .67 after correction for range restriction (Deary et al., 2013). That is strong continuity across almost 80 years, with plenty of room for individuals to move. More in intelligence across the lifespan.
Reading an old score
Many people have a number from a childhood assessment and wonder how it compares with a score today. A few things are worth checking before you compare:
- Which test and which scale. Most modern tests use a standard deviation of 15, but older Stanford-Binet forms used 16 and the Cattell Culture Fair III scale uses 24 (Wikipedia: IQ classification). The same percentile prints as a different number on each. The percentile to IQ converter shows all three.
- When the test was normed. Average performance rose through much of the 20th century, by about 2.8 points per decade across many countries (Pietschnig & Voracek, 2015). A score from a test with old norms can read higher than the same performance would against current ones.
- Measurement error. Clinical scores carry a confidence interval, often around plus or minus 5 points at 95% (Wechsler, 2008). Two scores a few points apart may not differ at all.
- Practice. Each time you take a cognitive test, you get a little more familiar with the format. Retakes score about a quarter of a standard deviation higher on average (Hausknecht et al., 2007).
Put together, a childhood score and an adult score are best compared as rough percentiles, not as exact numbers.
What this means for IQ Octopus
IQ Octopus is designed for adults. It does not ask your age and does not apply age norms. Its puzzles are mostly fluid-reasoning tasks, the kind whose raw performance peaks earliest. Two practical consequences follow:
- If you are well past your twenties, your IQ Octopus estimate may read lower than an age-normed clinical score would, because you are not being compared only with people your own age.
- Pace does not change your estimated IQ on IQ Octopus. Only which puzzles you answer correctly counts, and the time limit is generous, so slower, careful work is not penalized.
Read the full method on how it works, and for the population-level story of how average scores have shifted across generations, see the Flynn effect.
Sources
- Hartshorne, J. K., & Germine, L. T. (2015). Psychological Science, 26(4), 433-443. doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567339
- Salthouse, T. A. (2009). Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4), 507-514.
- Intelligence quotient. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient
- Fluid and crystallized intelligence. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_and_crystallized_intelligence
- Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015). Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 98-108. doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.105
- IQ classification. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_classification
- Pietschnig, J., & Voracek, M. (2015). One century of global IQ gains. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 282-306. doi.org/10.1177/1745691615577701
- Wechsler, D. (2008). WAIS-IV Technical and Interpretive Manual. Pearson.
- Hausknecht, J. P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo, N. T., & Moriarty Gerrard, M. O. (2007). Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 373-385. doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.373
- Deary, I. J., Pattie, A., & Starr, J. M. (2013). The stability of intelligence from age 11 to age 90 years: The Lothian Birth Cohort of 1921. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2361-2368. doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486487